[peyton randolph]

Are you really making a judgment on women vote based on a stupid and totally wrong, based on zero facts, absolutely delusional article written by this Myran Blyth?

---

No. Just expressing frustration with women who vote their emotions rather than based on logic. The same morons who will vote Dim this fall b/c of Foley also voted for predator-in-chief Clinton twice. As I said, logic has nothing to do with it.

[jveritas]

So those women are not Republican voters to start with. However this dumb author is saying in her article that women are going to vote in drove for the democrats because of the Foley issue and totally forget the national security issue. Also she is assuming that most women are too stupid to believe the democrat lies that the Republican party as whole must be punished for the sins of Foley.

[Prospero]

logic has nothing to do with it.

It's a legitimate gripe, your "frustration with women who vote their emotions..." Here in NC, 55 percent of the population, 55 percent of the population eligible to vote, 55 percent of the registered voters, 55 percent of the registered voters who actually vote, are women.

In 1998, 2/3 of the latter registered Republican women voters, voted to re-elect Johnny Edwards to represent this State in the U.S. Senate. About the only vote he subsequently showed up to cast over the next six years was acquit Bill Clinton of purjury.

If this keeps up, male voters are going to have to seek protection under Section 5 of the henious, discriminatory and recently renewed federal Voting Rights Act, as "a historically discriminated group...whose vote has been submerged into a larger voting block."