[EternalVigilance]

I did read your opening comment. You have thus far not provided reason to believe that the concluions are false.

The weight of proof falls on the proponents of this wild theory. To date, they have provided none. This article presented none. Just speculation and opinion.

Scientific statements are always tentative; pointing this out does not falsify any scientific claim.

Articles in "Science" don't prove any "scientific" claim.

[Dimensio]

The weight of proof falls on the proponents of this wild theory. To date, they have provided none.

You are holding a scientific claim to a standard -- proof -- to which nothing in science is ever held.

This article presented none. Just speculation and opinion.

Incorrect. This article details observation from which conclusions have been drawn. If you have reason to believe that the conclusions are invalid, then you are free to present evidence for your position, but denying that any observations were made does not support your claim, as you clearly are contradicting reality.