[EternalVigilance]

So you do believe that you can contradict claims by selectively boldfacing words? How, exactly, did your boldfacing of selected portions of the article demonstrate that the content of the article is false?

I guess you failed to read my opening comment:

Pure propaganda. The usual mix of unsubstantiated opening statements of certitude, mixed with the usual slide into the vaguest of "maybes".

[Dimensio]

I guess you failed to read my opening comment:

I did read your opening comment. You have thus far not provided reason to believe that the concluions are false. Scientific statements are always tentative; pointing this out does not falsify any scientific claim.