[freeper_peeper]

You said: "So instead of using the term 'homosexual', the more appropriate term would to call him/her 'one who engages in homosexual acts'."

Good point.

Perhaps "practicing homosexual" would be concise enough since they practice perversion.

Question_Assumptions said: "I think it's the fact that many gay men were introduced to that culture when they were in those age groups and if I remember correctly, those who have been molested themselves tend to molest others. I think we are seeing a vicious circle here."

You're right. And that's the primary reason they're trying to get into the Boy Scouts and have already gotten into our schools.

Chuzzlewit said: "I think it's simply a matter of gay men desiring the freshest meat available."

Sadly, very tragically, you're right too. It keeps the feeding trough filled.

Lormand, thanks for your courage in saying what you did and I wish the very best for you. Godspeed.

[George W. Bush]

Perhaps "practicing homosexual" would be concise enough since they practice perversion.

The original poster had it right. There is no such thing as a homosexual or a heterosexual. There is only behavior.

You find that if you actually debate this issue with 'gay men', taking this tactic really throws them and makes them mad. You're, in effect, telling them that they are imaginary creatures. Then you can bring the subject back to their behavior and misuse of their sexual organs.

The mythological creatures known as the homosexual and the heterosexual, later termed 'gay' and 'straight', are the creations of modern clinical psychology, primarily Kinsey.

If you adopt the enemy's words and concepts, you have handed him a subtle weapon with which to deflect you.