he has posted the lawyers letter.
The lawyers letter is fluff. He does not deny the IMs are from Edmunds in fact he points out Ross has been correct in the past.
The report is that of ABC screwing up and posting all the wrong data.
Jones is disembling. Put this in front of a judge and the FIRST question the judge will want to know is if Edmunds is the person in question. THEN we start to have discovery.
Does Edmunds (or the people paying for his lawyer) REALLY want deep probing discovery? Will Ross divulge the truth?
Perhaps the house ethics committee wants to know who is paying for Edmunds Lawyer, perhaps a few subpoenas from the house will clarify the minds.
No doubt you've already made sure the folks in the House aware of that.
Well, my impression from the McVeigh trial was that Jones is something of an attention whore - wouldn't surprise me if he is doing this for the attention...