Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expat_panama
If there's any connection between public debt and private wealth, then paying off the war debt didn't seem to hurt us nearly as much as the budget surplus of the late '90s. Then again, I'm not willing to say there is a connection anymore than you are.

You're right, I don't see much correlation between public debt and private wealth. As you can see from the following graph, the decline in household wealth was due chiefly to a decline in equities and pensions and, looking at the entire period from 1994 to 2002, real per-capita wealth continued to increase:

The actual numbers and sources are at http://home.att.net/~rdavis2/worth.html.

Cheers, and don't forget to vote!

Thanks, I remembered. Hope you did as well!

223 posted on 11/11/2006 1:27:10 AM PST by remember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: remember
..don't see much correlation between public debt and private wealth...

Which brings us back a month ago when I came in to your chat with olderwiser when I said (in post 190) "that tax-cuts haven't kept things from getting better."

I like your idea of 'core wealth' vs 'volatile asset prices'; kind of like 'core inflation'.  There's a problem with the fact that stocks and land only leave you us an apple core of just a fifth of our assets, while taking out food and energy from price indexes only removed a fifth of the basket of purchases.  

But hey, maybe we can include a moving average of land and stock prices --the reasoning can be that people own pension funds and land over several years.

We got possibilities here...

224 posted on 11/15/2006 11:40:51 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson