Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
I think what you may be missing in this is the give with one hand and take with another. The money statement I believe is: "This case reflects political calculations by GOP strategists that voters do not mind the details"

If it really was a matter as to what area(s) were more suitable that could well have been and should have been the focus of the bill. As it is now we have the fox guarding the hen house.

14 posted on 10/06/2006 7:13:25 AM PDT by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: engrpat

The "money statement" is made by some unnamed analyst that the Washington Post used in the article.

We don't even know that the "analyst" is a Republican.

It's pretty clear to me that Washington Post achieved the desired effect in writing this story. They'll minimize and spin any achievement by the GOP congress to discourage conservative voters.

Looks like it's working.


18 posted on 10/06/2006 7:30:14 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson