Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will we survive the Clinton process?
Canada Free Press ^ | October 6, 2006 | John Burtis

Posted on 10/06/2006 5:48:18 AM PDT by veronica

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: doberville

Every column Burtis writes is a gem.


21 posted on 10/06/2006 6:50:18 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: veronica

"Bill and Hillary's open charnal house"

Charnal, good word, most fitting, first thought was it was a typo - looked it up and found......

charnal: a building or chamber in which bodies or bones are deposited.

John Burtis must be a graduate of the Steyn school of journalism.


22 posted on 10/06/2006 6:59:17 AM PDT by RedWireNut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Good points, most don't realize how evil these two really are. The proof is in the continuing support they have. How else can this on-going support be viewed? Oh sure, "polls" show lact of support at times, but that really means nothing push come to shove.

The DNC is working towards the destruction of this form of government aided by RINOs and other fellow travelers. All are weakened by their immoral lifestyles, lack of leadership and constant quest for another term rather than working for the good of the country.

31 yrs. in law enforcement taught me that there will be MUCH support to enforce oppressive laws enacted by another Clinton regime. Power over people's lives drives many LE officers, not duty or service to citizens. It's the other way around for them, citizens own them allegiance and servitude.


23 posted on 10/06/2006 7:00:12 AM PDT by brushcop (Lt. Harris, SFC Salie, CPL Long, SPC Hornbeck, B-Co, 2/69 3ID We will remember you always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Chuck Colson went to the slammer for a year of one count of the felony that Craig Livingstone committed hundreds or thousands of counts of. Colson's misdeed was part of the brief for the impeachment of Richard Nixon.

The improper accessing of those eyes-only FBI dossiers by a White House staffer contaminates an administration because no one in the White House can prove the negative proposition that they personally did not improperly see the information in those dossiers.

The logical inference that besmirches the reputation of everyone in the Clinton White House generally, and of Mr. and Mrs. Clinton in particular, is compounded in the Livingstone affair by the fact that not only did the White House stonewall the affair and retain Mr. Livingstone until after he had been forced to testify before a congressional committee about the matter, and not only was Mr. Livingstone not prosecuted as Mr. Colson was, responsibility for hiring or even for firing Mr. Livigstone was not assigned to anyone in the Clinton White House.

Somebody in the Clinton White House hired Craig Livingstone. Somebody in the Clinton White House finally fired Craig Livingstone. Whoever hired him should not have done it, and whoever fired him should have done so on the very first indication of that he was improperly accessing those dossiers. If ever there was a logical application of the doctrine of absolute "it happened on his watch" responsibility, this case was it.

That would have implied the impeachment and conviction of the president, an open-and-shut case. And had a Republican been in the White House - even had there been a Republican majority in both houses of Congress - that is exactly what would have happened. But it did not happen. But one thing is undeniable about the Livingstone affair: no one who was in the Clinton White House in 1993 is clear of suspicion of complicity in it. And accordingly, no one who was in the Clinton White House in 1993 should ever be considered for any office of public trust. Not for Senate, and certainly not for the presidency.


24 posted on 10/06/2006 7:02:27 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonehead4freedom

The files remained at the FBI. Copies were sent to the White House Security Office, and at the end of the Clintoon Administration those files were "Presidential Papers" and carted off to the National Archives.

So, no, the files were never 'returned'.


25 posted on 10/06/2006 7:03:23 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
So the war room has the ammo ready to go as we have seen this election cycle and will be in full blown terminator mode when her majassnasty runs in 08.Thanks for the info.
26 posted on 10/06/2006 7:08:20 AM PDT by bonehead4freedom (New York Times ,all the news fit to omit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Perhaps the only thing that can derail the Clinton juggernaut is unfortunately another 9-11 attack on US soil. It is only a matter of time until the Islamofascists have the means to deliver a dirty bomb or a biological weapon like anthrax.

If the Clintonistas take power, the war on terror will again be reduced to a politically correct police action and the inevitable cut and run from Iraq will be seen through out the Middle East as a victory for the Islamofascists. Iran will get its bomb and assume the role as the new Islamic Caliphate and fully support the terrorist groups in an all out offensive against the west. The US will be seen as too cowardly to fight.

Another attack on US soil will, like Pearl Harbor, galvanize us to fight Islamofascism and lets hope there is a Churchillian leader in the wings who will have the backbone to lead us in that dark hour.

27 posted on 10/06/2006 7:18:08 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

I still maintain that Hillary could barely win 3 states. I stand by that.


28 posted on 10/06/2006 7:21:25 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

we are strong enough to keep her OUT of the WH, however, the United States of New York think she's the best thing since sliced cheese....

Until we can RID them of ALL speaking engagements; government offices; politics everywhere; and send them to a foreign country to live and take their friends, we will have to fight everyday to keep our government in the hands of the Republicans....the Democrats CANNOT and SHOULD NOT be trusted EVER!!!


29 posted on 10/06/2006 7:21:45 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Will we survive the Clintons? That really is the question. Certainly, many individuals associated with the Clintons didn't survive. They are dead. Too many to be considered normal. At the party level, the demonrat party has not done well and drastically lost numbers during his reign. Think of all the governors that went republican. Same for the Senate and House.

All Clinton could claim as his accomplishment was "the economy, stupid." But, had he a demonrat house and/or senate, they would have tanked the economy, one that he really just inherited from the groundwork Ronald Reagan had put into place. As is was, the economy was in bad shape when GWB was elected. Thanks to GWB, the economy is really booming now, despite the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And, much of the blame for those conflicts can be put on Clinton, with the potential of more to come. We can only wonder what all was sold or given to the Chicoms, the N. Koreans, the Saudis, etc. that will eventually be used against us on some battlefield.

The boy sold us all out, all for some campaign contributions, donations to the Clinton library and very likely, blackmail for things that never went public. We were lucky we didn't have to go through anything worse than 9/11. I shudder to think what would happen to us if the Clinton crime family is able to return to the White House. God, save us all.

30 posted on 10/06/2006 7:33:16 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Yes, but how many could she steal?


31 posted on 10/06/2006 7:44:48 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Thanks for posting this. We must never forget what utter trash the clintons are, and be ever vigilant against their evil plans.

John Burtis is a terrific writer, but he seems overly nostalgic for the "old" Democratic Party. Was the party of Hubert Humphry and Adlai Stevenson an institution noble in its ideology? No way! They'd have sold us out to the Reds.


32 posted on 10/06/2006 7:47:17 AM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

I agree with you but unfortunately there are a lot of stupid people out there who believe the MSM and vote.


33 posted on 10/06/2006 7:54:02 AM PDT by proudofthesouth (Mao said that power comes at the point of a rifle; I say FREEDOM does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

> The Klinton's have friends in the FBI who continue feeding them dirt on the opposition.

Maybe they do... Read Louis Freeh's book My FBI where he tells how he resisted the impeached POS's efforts to politicize the Bureau.

Certainly they had access to intel till Sandy Burglar got caught with his pants stuffed.


34 posted on 10/06/2006 8:02:18 AM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: veronica

After a six year rest, more or less, the Clinton slime machine is back.

It's cunning and ruthlessly efficient.


35 posted on 10/06/2006 8:14:25 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Great read.


36 posted on 10/06/2006 8:14:32 AM PDT by Texas Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brushcop
I'm former L.E. too. And I agree with your point of narcissism versus the public good. Me thinks its also worsening versus 20+ years ago.
37 posted on 10/06/2006 8:19:39 AM PDT by raftguide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cloud8

There are bad people buried in the FBI, CIA, Justice, FBI, and particularly the State Dept. There is no reason to believe the FBI is clean of klintonoids.


38 posted on 10/06/2006 8:35:50 AM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: veronica

BTTT!

GREAT Post!


39 posted on 10/06/2006 8:40:07 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

I'll take a guess...
MA, IL, and CA?


40 posted on 10/06/2006 9:08:41 AM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson