[Alia]

Also yesterday, several more pages came forward with accounts of purported misconduct by Mr. Foley. ABC News reported that three pages, one each from 1998, 2000 and 2002, described being subject to sexual advances from Mr. Foley over the Internet, sometimes in graphic terms. The network did not name these persons.

RELEASE THEIR NAMES, damnnit -- these are not RAPE (alleged) victims.

Oh oh... right. Feminist mantra: Words equal rape.

[Republican Red]

ABC is using replies to a webform on their site as proof positive of these emails.

Respondents DO NOT have to leave name, phone number, address etc... Any KOS kid can write in with a story and it will not be verified but it will be reported

[Wuli]

You can be sure that the Congressional Pages who engaged in salacious IM conversations with Foley, whether as pages or later, were either:

(1) gay and did not feel "abused" by Foley or

(2)were guys who well knew the nature of the prank they were involved in and needed no goading from Foley - no matter what their age.

Foley's predeliction for teens is immoral. That does not make every teen he may have been in contact with "moral" or pure as the driven snow. Let's not forget that whether for personal or political reasons some of those involved have had agendas and Foley was a tool in their agendas.

Foely should get whatever he deserves, but many of the pages were not "innocent"; don't put all of them on a pedestal that surely only some of them deserve.

[Kaslin]

You had better all stop using instant messaging, or you might catch deadly diseases