He's The Last Man Standing On Refugee Island And Costs Australia £8m A Year

The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 10-6-2006 | Nick Squires

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Why can't he go back to Iraq?

[patton]

You gotta laugh. Give me some paper, a pen, a few text books...hey, how do you sign up for this?

Ach, tja - my maths profs used to say I was wierd.

[nuconvert]

"and has even worked part-time as a computer technician at a local college"

Did I miss something?

[KJC1]

Yeah, that's what I'm wondering too. Maybe he has made statements like wanting to kill Australians, etc, when they have troops in Iraq now.

[VOA]

Dealing with Muslims is...always expensive.

[SevenofNine]

OH AD do you want this guy running around your country LOL!

[KJC1]

I just looked at his website and it's just about software. Strange, I thought it was supposed to have pics and entries documenting his situation.

[Publius6961]

The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation has given no reason for its assessment and yesterday declined to answer questions on the case.
Who writes this crap? No government is obligated to "give explanations" for its national security actions to any nutcase group that demands one. In free society, that can change by the democratic process; or not.

Not only will Australia not accept Sagar as a refugee, the ruling acts as a deterrent to any other nation throwing open its doors.
Well, then, that is an entirely different problem, isn't it?
Why aren't "all other nations" assumed to have their own standards for what are deemed "national" security issues without attempting inferences that Australia does, or should make that decision for them?

Only irrational, self-styled "human rights" neurotic moonbats employ that logic.

[Dammit]

blam, no offense, but your keywords are weird. They're supposed to be themes of the article, not bits of the headline.

Maybe "Nauru", "Australia", "Sagar", "Immigration". Something like that. Keywords are what some people use to find articles related to a particular issue. Nobody is going to search for this article using "8M" as a keyword.

[nuconvert]

http://www.leftonnauru.com/photos.html

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

I get the feeling that we are not hearing the whole story.

[KJC1]

Thanks.
Maybe it's just my computer but all I got with that link is an error message.

[mathurine]

pardon me for not giving a sh**te about him, hers or its. I never heard of him. Socially speaking he is a retard or worse.

[JCEccles]

There HAS to be more to this. The Australian government likely has sound information that the man is a no-kidding security risk or has been involved in some vile activities that make him an undesirable immigrant. The fact that no other country, including a newly Democratic Iraq, will take him raises even more questions.

But the leftists in Australia think he's just swell.

[nuconvert]

hmmm...works fine for me.

How about trying here and clicking on "Photos at the camp"

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=www.leftonnauru.com&btnG=Google+Search

[blam]

"blam, no offense, but your keywords are weird. They're supposed to be themes of the article, not bits of the headline."

"Maybe "Nauru", "Australia", "Sagar", "Immigration". Something like that. Keywords are what some people use to find articles related to a particular issue. Nobody is going to search for this article using "8M" as a keyword."

Well, This is my record:

You've posted a total of 7,565 threads and 48,128 replies.

I have had a total of six people complain. The last was an admin moderator last night.

Thank you. You're the only one who has explained what I should be doing. I always thought it had to be the words in the title so that a search would turn-up this article and not have duplicate posts. And, I have always thought that the more words from the title would ensure better success.

Now I understand, it should be words that represent the article and not just the title.

Now, maybe people will stop bitchin' at me Dammit! (I'm laughing at myself)

Thanks again.

[KJC1]

Thank you, I appreciate it.

I have no idea why the first link didn't work for me, since it was the same URL of the pics, LOL.

[Publius6961]

"They can't go back to Iraq, they can't go to any other country, they can't appeal the security assessment, and they can't even find out what it's about. I think that would drive anybody crazy."

Well, if all it takes is to make a statement to make somethng true, I can play that game...

...He can't stay in Australia.

Next cosmic problem...

[rock_lobsta]

Ok... so he's lonely. I know how to resolve this.

Let's send the other 1.5 billion of his mates to join him.

Definitely a win-win, the way I see it. :-)