Posted on 10/05/2006 3:02:36 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
A team of scientists led by University of Maryland physics professor James Drake appear to have solved a key remaining mystery about how the interaction of magnetic fields produce the explosive releases of energy seen in solar flares, storms in the Earths magnetosphere and many other powerful cosmic events.
In recent years, researchers have answered many questions about this process, but one thing they have been unable to explain is data from solar observing satellites indicating that up to half of the energy released during solar flares is in the form of energetic electrons. Large numbers of these low-mass particles travel at speeds far higher than can be explained by the widely accepted slingshot model for how reconnecting magnetic field lines accelerate charged particles.
Now, a team of scientists led by University of Maryland physics professor James Drake appears to have found the answer. In the October 5 edition of the journal Nature, Drake and his colleagues release findings showing that electrons gain speed (kinetic energy) by repeatedly reflecting, or bouncing, off of the ends of contracting magnetic islands that form as the magnetic field lines reconnect. The mechanism is analogous to the increase of energy a pinball gains when it bounces between multiple round bumpers. Except in this case the bumpers (magnetic islands) arent stationary, they actually converge on the pinball (electron) causing it to gain speed with each bounce.
Ours is the first mechanism that explains why electrons gain so much energy during magnetic reconnection, said Drake, a professor in the Department of Physics and the University of Marylands Institute for Physical Science and Technology. And from a practical standpoint, these new findings can help scientists to better predict which solar storms pose the greatest threat to communications and other satellites.
Drake explained that the strongest confirming evidence for the new theory was the surprising agreement between their model and data from NASAs WIND satellite. We were as surprised as the WIND scientists when the distribution of energetic electrons seen by their spacecraft popped right out of our model. Such a match isnt something you see very often, he said.
Physicists have long been convinced that the primary mechanism for release of magnetic energy is a process called magnetic reconnection that occurs when oppositely-directed magnetic field lines come in contact. During this process, parallel magnetic field lines break and reconnect, forming back-to-back slingshots that release their energy by exploding outwards in opposite directions. Since charged particles are trapped on magnetic field lines, most of the energy in the magnetic field is converted to the kinetic energy of the ionized particles (plasma) pulled along by the expanding field lines.
However, like a rock propelled by the snapping rubber bands of a sling shot, a charged particle can gain only as much speed, or kinetic energy, as that of the moving magnetic field lines that propel it. Until now, scientists have had no convincing mechanism to explain how electrons in Earths magnetosphere reach energies hundreds of thousands of times higher than the electron energies associated with large-scale reconnection-driven flows.
Storms from the Sun
The Earth's magnetic field forms the magnetosphere, which shields the planet, protecting it from solar storms. Solar storms are "winds" of charged particles and radiation flowing from the Sun, often as the result of violent solar eruptions of hot gas known as coronal mass ejections. Even with the protection of Earth's magnetic field, the strongest solar storms can disrupt electric power grids and disturb or damage satellite-based communications and navigation systems.
Space weather generally varies with the 11-year sunspot cycle: the more sunspots, the more storms and the more voluminous the "solar wind," as scientists call the stream of charged particles that incessantly blows off the face of the sun. In March of this year scientists with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, predicted that the next 11-year solar storm cycle should be significantly stronger than the current one, which could mean big problems for cellular phones, GPS systems and other satellite-enabled technology. According to the center, stronger solar storms could start as early as this year or as late as 2008 and should peak around 2012.
"Lost" ping...

Illustration showing electrons and other charged particles streaming from the sun (right) and hitting Earth's magnetic field (left).
Ah, a researcher from my alma mater, the University of Delaware, was involved with this. Cool!
And unscarmabled it spells DHARMA...
read tonight bump
That's what I was thinking upon seeing the title.
Okay, cool, but how to weaponize it?
I'm betting now, give them 20 minutes and a government grant and this will be our fault and cause global warming.
HAHAHAHA!!! That's the first thing I thought of, too! Did you watch the season premier last night?
Nice pun

Anything that will keep this from happening again.
Yeah, it was good. I'm a little disappointed in the kidnapped trio though, for not killing their captors when they had ample opportunity. But there's sure to be some big battles in the future, so I'm hopeful.
When exactly did they have the opportunity? (Other than Jack, it would have been easy for him to kill that blond sandwich lady, but then he'd overcome his inner struggle between survival and conscience, and that's good for at least four more episodes.)
That's what I thought of!
"Even with the protection of Earth's magnetic field, the strongest solar storms can disrupt electric power grids and disturb or damage satellite-based communications and navigation systems."
Reminds me of:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2006/arch06/060512chargedplanets.htm
A, B, C, D, Electric Solar System
Here we meet an old dilemma once again. Standard astronomy begins its investigations with the assumption--usually unspokenof an electrically neutral universe. So when investigators encounter electrical phenomena, they rely upon local "generators" no matter how improbable. And they will ignore the evidence for larger electric circuits that have, in fact, already answered the question posed: the local transactions involve circuits, not one-way paths. And the local circuits are subsidiaries of larger circuits.
Start with a double layer tin foil hat and google HAARP...
Earthpulse Press
http://www.earthpulse.com/src/subcategory.asp?catid=1&subcatid=2
"HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an "ionospheric heater". (The ionosphere is the electrically-charged sphere surrounding Earth's upper atmosphere. It ranges between about 40- to 600 miles above Earth's surface.)"
http://www.earthpulse.com/src/product.asp?productid=5
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.