I'll try. If the Democraps gain control of Congress it will be because of Savage. Perot got Clinton elected, and Savage is the latest Perot. You and Savage don't seem to be aware of this. Because of your ignorance you will probably stay home and not vote. Now you have been informed.
"If the Democraps gain control of Congress it will be because of Savage."
BS. He doesn't have that kind of "Rush influence", B. You're giving him too much credit, IMO.
"Perot got Clinton elected, and Savage is the latest Perot. You and Savage don't seem to be aware of this."
I'm very aware of that fact, B. I can't speak for Savage. I think he might have said that before, though; just can't place it, precisely.
Thanks for "informing" me, and all of us dolts.
(((Hey, your NOLA yellow bus is leaving!)))
"I'll try. If the Democraps gain control of Congress it will be because of Savage. Perot got Clinton elected, and Savage is the latest Perot. You and Savage don't seem to be aware of this. Because of your ignorance you will probably stay home and not vote. Now you have been informed."
NO, if the Republicans lose the congress, it's because of their incompetence. Even Laura Ingrham, who is much more in line with the Republican mainstream, has admitted that if the GOP loses the congress it's because of their betrayal of their conservative base. Face it, unnecessary scandals, a half-hearted war on terror, minimal resistance to eminent domain, post-humous attempts at border control, support of the Clintonesque CAFTA bill, impotence in the face of our trade deficits, allowing security checks in the Panama Canal by a Chinese connected firm from Hong Kong, etc., need I go on. The GOP has merely proven the founding fathers' warnings about absolute power. Don't blame Savage for modern political betrayel of true conservative nationalism. We need more infidels and less infidelity.
Differences between Savage and Perot:
(1) Savage is a conservative.
(2) Savage defends Bush when Bush acts like a conservative.
(3) Nobody is voting for Savage. He's not on a ballot.
No, it will be because many of you out there let the GOP get away with open borders, out of control spending, no real punishment for Clintonista's like Sandy Burglar, no real tax cuts...
Nonsense. Bush gave it away. He refused to go negative against the revolting Clinton. In typical Bush family fashion, he took the "high road", and was defeated. Significantly Bush also did not place an hour-long ad the night before the election as many of us Bush workers urged them to do, as did Perot and Clinton (30 min). Bush had a huge chance to explain the situation to Perot voters: your man cannot possibly win, and if you vote for him this draft-dodger will win. Bush just seemed bored with the process, which later was partially explained by the medication he was on that year for Graves Disease, which produced fatigue and partial memory loss as side effects. Finally, the Lawrence Walsh "November Surprise" the Sunday before the election put a nail in the Bush effort, just as he was starting to gain momentum.
I know all this logic is probably wasted on "Blake#1" since he is an ignoramus. But I figured I would set the record straight regardless.