[AmeriBrit]

They were all 17,18 and older. There wasn't any aged 16yrs involved.

Would you prefer I post that to you one sentence at a time, so as to give each one time to sink in?

[martinidon]

Oh I am sorry, since these kids were 17 and 18 it is okay for a 52 yr old gay congressman to hit on them.

The boy's who parents complained was 16 at the time. But, thats okay, because it was legal and he was a consenting adult.

It has sunk in, we have a perverted gay congressman hitting on young "legal" "consenting" adults and the Republican leadership did not do enough to investigate this dirt bag. Hell, they even encouraged him to run fro re-election!

[SolomoninSouthDakota]

"They were all 17,18 and older. There wasn't any aged 16yrs involved.

Would you prefer I post that to you one sentence at a time, so as to give each one time to sink in?"

Is some one here running interference to aid the drive-by media. I can't imagine many at all having big problems with the emails to the 16 year old. Millions upon millions of emails of Americans would need to be investigated if those emails are of a level to tirgger criminal probes. They only seem so much worse since we know more about the author--and maybe we don't even know that. Now the FBI is saying the emails were tampered with--(or was it the IMs?)

Now look at the 18 year old. But why????? that is the age of consent! Foley and whatever his name is could have been married in Mass. at the time.

This is very much looking like an attempted set up and now with Pelosi refusing lie detector testimony that just adds credence to such a view.