[vbmoneyspender]

I think you missed the context I was using the quote in. Hanson damned Woodward for making unspported allegations against various people. Hanson, however, does the exact same thing when he writes thus:

How odd, this controversy: traditional moralists like some of the Republicans are defending a predatory pederast who seems to be infatuated with teen-age Congressional pages who are entrusted as near children to his care, . . .

I think a footnote or two naming the Republicans who are defending 'a predatory pederast' would be nice, don't you?

[stainlessbanner]

Hanson, however, does the exact same thing when he writes

He rails against "unidentified" sources, then does it himself. Strange.

[RexBeach]

I see. Got it. Wasn't clear to me in your first post.

-Rex