To: HAL9000
This is an unfortunate situation. We're already overextended with Iraq and Afghanistan. We don't have the ability produce weapons or train draftees (if it comes to that) in sufficient numbers fast enough to fight a conventional war on the peninsula. It would be over before we could even get geared up.
That's all assuming, of course, that we intend to fight a conventional war. From the talk coming out of Chris Hill, conventional warfare might not even be under consideration anymore.
6 posted on
10/05/2006 8:36:38 AM PDT by
JamesP81
(The answer always lies with more freedom; not less)
To: JamesP81
That's all assuming, of course, that we intend to fight a conventional war. From the talk coming out of Chris Hill, conventional warfare might not even be under consideration anymore. You don't bring a knife to a gunfight.
If Kim Jong Il wants to play with guns, we'll play with guns.
7 posted on
10/05/2006 8:41:57 AM PDT by
Steel Wolf
(As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
To: JamesP81
We don't have the ability produce weapons or train draftees (if it comes to that) in sufficient numbers fast enough to fight a conventional war on the peninsula. We still have lots of Guard heavy forces that could be thrown into the fight. Some might take over in the sandbox, but I doubt there'd be time to make the swap. In fact I doubt there'd be time to move any significant ground forces to Korea. Navy and Air Force aren't very much occupied at the moment though, and they'd be enough to turn everything important in NK into a smoking ruin. The question would be whether they could do it fast enough to prevent the destruction of Seoul.
12 posted on
10/05/2006 9:54:15 AM PDT by
El Gato
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson