Interesting... The dems know this how?
Also, ABC *MUST* produce their evidence to demonstrate the "underage" side of things now. This may include names, due to their obvious falsehood or distortion based on the thus-far produced IMs.
I'm curious if ABC actually has ANY more IMs.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Blogger_outs_boy_in_Foley_scandal_1004.html
If the boy was over the age of 18 at the time of the messages, Foley's communication with him would likely still be considered criminal. Sex predator legislation is generally written bearing in mind that law enforcement sting operations rely on undercover officers pretending to be minors.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2865796&mesg_id=2865796