Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paltz

Interesting... The dems know this how?

Also, ABC *MUST* produce their evidence to demonstrate the "underage" side of things now. This may include names, due to their obvious falsehood or distortion based on the thus-far produced IMs.

I'm curious if ABC actually has ANY more IMs.


33 posted on 10/05/2006 6:49:21 AM PDT by MortMan (I was going to be indecisive, but I changed my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan
This is how the libs are spinning it in case you're wondering:

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Blogger_outs_boy_in_Foley_scandal_1004.html
If the boy was over the age of 18 at the time of the messages, Foley's communication with him would likely still be considered criminal. Sex predator legislation is generally written bearing in mind that law enforcement sting operations rely on undercover officers pretending to be minors.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2865796&mesg_id=2865796

46 posted on 10/05/2006 9:08:29 AM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson