Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M Kehoe
Now that sound like a winner!! This is the first article I've read that has followed the actual time-line of this incident. From what I understand, these emails were sent in 2003 and the IM are newer. (Am I right?) If my math is correct, this young man would now be 19, not quite a 21 years old, but much closer to the age of Monica Lewinsky.

For how long, and when, were the IM sent?

I don't like pedophiles any better than any other sane person, but I just couldn't imagine that Foley would be that legally stupid.
59 posted on 10/04/2006 10:21:59 PM PDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: singfreedom
From what I understand, these emails were sent in 2003 and the IM are newer. (Am I right?)

You have it backwards. The emails were from 2005. The IMs were from 2003. The IM kid turned 18 in February of 2003.

121 posted on 10/05/2006 8:10:22 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson