Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
The Drudge Report ^ | 10-04-06 | Drudge

Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
To: The_Reader_David
sounds more like the ex-page coming on to Foley than the other way around

I thought the same thing when I saw that on another thread yesterday. At that point I thought the page was interested whether he was of age or not.

461 posted on 10/04/2006 6:30:05 PM PDT by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
I for one would not want him back in Congress--we have higher standards than that.

However, we should roll an s-load of $$$ into that FLorida House race so the new GOP standard bearer wins it and the word goes out that a vote for Foley will actually go to the stand in guy.

462 posted on 10/04/2006 6:30:22 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

If he was 18 then Pelosi should resign. Harman should resign. Reid should resign.

THEN we go after the dirty trick group, C.R.E.W. and go after them CRIMINALLY.

If this is true this is BEYOND STUPID.


463 posted on 10/04/2006 6:30:28 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

still to early-will get some legs by the morning


464 posted on 10/04/2006 6:30:29 PM PDT by ground_fog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Cool it, Norm. You and I both know the kid was under 18 duing some of the IMs. You admitted it in another post. Making fun of me is not going to change the facts.

but the IMs didn't become sexual in nature until after he had turned 18 - not doing your homework isn't going to change the facts either. but you know this already and i agree that he was probably looking for a lover in the page pool and happy to see him resign.
465 posted on 10/04/2006 6:30:39 PM PDT by YummiBox (tagline intentionally left blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
... ABC lied and the over sensationalizing

Okay I got a question. A bit R rated but give me some space.

I regularly converse with my 45 year old sister. I am 56. She is single; I am married.

Hell we IM about sex all the time. We talk about guys she's dated with little ones, guys what couldn't get it up, some that have big ones. I complain that my husband doesn't do such and such when I think he should. Hey, we're sisters. Sisters talk about stuff like this.

I mentioned that thing about the cell phone. Hell I probably got a cell phone filled with some dirty IM's from her.

So could I sell my sister's X-rated IM's (remember that my replies to her do NOT save on my cell) to ABC? Could they just, boom, print them? Is this against the law maybe unless she gives permission.

I mean, come on, IM's and email. Most of America would be in jail for suggestive IM's. Sure I know about the underage bit and understand it. But if it's adults, go on. I can talk about sex if I want, hell I could have cybersex if I want.

Way I see it, we're all going to jail.

466 posted on 10/04/2006 6:30:52 PM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

My point is he published it.... Then maybe had second thoughts.


467 posted on 10/04/2006 6:30:52 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: marajade

Putting on my tinfoil hat, I'd say this "mistake" was intentional as a way to funnel payoff cash to the ex-page, given that a multimillion dollar lawsuit over this "mistake" is inevitable. ABC will settle for a couple of million, the ex-page will have his payoff, and the Dems have their political hit piece.


468 posted on 10/04/2006 6:31:01 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: cll

Details please!

LLS


469 posted on 10/04/2006 6:31:14 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Colmes thinks the IMs weren't consensual????

The kid agreed to dinner and 'hanging out late' after he turned 18.

How exactly do you have an IM *exchange* without consenting by typing your end of the conversation? The kid could have hung up and blocked Foley's account from sending him IMs if he didn't want to exchange IM's with Foley.


470 posted on 10/04/2006 6:31:15 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: therut
CRICKEY!!

SOME ONE LET O"RIELY KNOW NOW OR HANNITY WHICH WILL BE ON NEXT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hannity talked about it...But Alan still insists this is big trouble..LOL. I can't wait to hear Rush on this tomorrow. I also can't wait to hear these words come out Matt idiot Lauers mouth in the morning.....IT's going to a good day.

471 posted on 10/04/2006 6:31:15 PM PDT by Fawn (http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: 1curiousmind

Oh it was sweet. Both Sean and Ann could barely hold back a laugh! Alan and the "Young Democrat Chick" were sticking to their talking points while Sean and Ann pulled this one out of their sleeves.

And yes, Mark Foley is still a creep. But all in all we got something better in return: Joe Negron, who seems like a fair guy and who's already ahead in the race.


472 posted on 10/04/2006 6:31:16 PM PDT by cll (Carthage must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: 1curiousmind

Yes, thanks for catching it. I changed it to be more historically accurate!


473 posted on 10/04/2006 6:31:17 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Are you wearing boxers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Oh how wonderful to encounter a fellow traveler on this road! I thought I might be the only one and it gets so lonely. I wish I knew what makes that combination so darned good. I've made it for others and their reaction has been "that's good" but nothing like what I experience.

Can you imagine having this same obsession for something illegal?

My Mom had a way of putting it, "There, but for the grace of God, go I." It's scary.


474 posted on 10/04/2006 6:31:28 PM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Brian Ross need to resign!


475 posted on 10/04/2006 6:31:55 PM PDT by incredulous joe ("I really dig Hannibal. He had real guts. He rode elephants into Cartilage." -- Mike Tyson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
if true, the GOP needs to push the story for at least 2 weeks. Don't let the dems drop it down the memory hole.

Remember, ABC knew the identity of the accuser and has 'fact checkers' to verify sources and stories (as one of my lib friends likes to point out). And they had this information for how long?? Obviously an effort to sway an election... is this close to election tampering?

476 posted on 10/04/2006 6:31:57 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carola
Yeah, I'm sure that's how the Democrats see it. Man/boy consensual sex between Democrats and their catamites if fine. Dirty flirting on IM by a Gay alcoholic Republican is an outrage. That's the ticket.
477 posted on 10/04/2006 6:32:00 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Civilization and democracy are under attack around the world, so Liberals attack Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan

But you still haven't proven anything....

(Running.........)


478 posted on 10/04/2006 6:32:04 PM PDT by misterrob (Bill Clinton, The Wizard of "Is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

lol


479 posted on 10/04/2006 6:32:04 PM PDT by 1curiousmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

But what, I wonder, was his motivation for going to work on Rep. Istook's campaign in OK?

There are some not pretty scenarios here. Can't believe it was all b/c he (the page) was for "school prayer" or whatever.


480 posted on 10/04/2006 6:32:10 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,401-1,409 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson