Posted on 10/04/2006 3:53:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
I have been saying this for days on FR. The RATs have no idea how they will set the "Gay" movement back 20 years with the Foley War. It is hilarious. Bravo Jim!
You're an idjit. Race has nothing to do with it.
And for those of you who are too thick-skulled to get it: people aren't mad at Foley because he's gay, they're mad at him because he abused his power.
bzzzzt! Wrong answer again. People are mad at Foley because he may be a gay PREDATOR.
What did the dimocrats know and when did they know it? Why, if they are sooo concerned about the children did they wait until it was politically opportunistic before they disclosed what they alleged had known for so long?
(NIBTZ)
Yeah, he's a gay predator. Again, it's the "predator" part of that that has most people angry.
And why won't you people debate? Why do you ban anyone who argues? Are your convictions that flimsy?
We must not end up banning repentant sinners from all employment (I know that this is not what you wrote but it can end up this way and essentially already has in many cases). We can force them into unlawful ways of making money and cause them to spiral into depression and hopelessness. This stress, pressure and social rejection can cause them to return to past evil ways. These past evil ways can cause more children to be hurt.
Even after 10 years I totally agree it would be wise to not let them into close situations with children. This would keep kids safe and also keep them out of temptation. We must forgive and love the repentant sinner for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God. Glory to God in The Highest! In our rush to do what is right let's not forget that He redeems. This is the heart of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Agreed, not all become true Christians. It is a tough subject.
The Dems aren't mad at him at all. They see it as a politcal blessing.
You see, Jim, they're special people. Really. For us, preying on 16-year-old boys is sleazy buggermongery, for them it's a blow - sorry, wrong word - for human freedom and dignity. Not that any senior Democrat would ever accept a Monica from his junior staffers, nossireeBubba. That would be wrong.
Maybe this will help restore the term "chickenhawk" to its original meaning - an adult homosexual on the prowl for underage boys. It's such a common phenomenon among the gay community they even had a nickname for the type. Foley's just one of many.
It's a good question to ask any Dem's who are using Foley in their campaign material.
Retread troll zotted again. Hey, go debate on DU! You're not welcome here.
I agree they see it as a political blessing but in order for them to appear 'credible' they have to pretend outrage and anger. Secretly they're grinning behind their sleeves like the Cheshire cat with the proverbial canary. Here's to hoping they end up with a rotweiller's tail instead of the canary.
"You want to debate wether GAY is a RACE?"
Libs just are not very smart people, eh?
democrats surely know there is no statue of limitations on murder?
You'll notice that Republicans will always get into trouble if they act like Democrats.
That does seem to be their message doesn't it. LOL
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.