To: conservative in nyc
They were sloppy.
Were they? Or did they know that Mr. Edmunds was working for possibly the next Governor of Oklahoma? It was mentioned that this guys AIM account was seldom used after 2002, and only a few times in '03 to corrospond with Foley. Hmmm, could some left wing nut job have hijacked this kids AIM account and used it to smear Foley, and in the same fail swoop shoot a budding hawk out of the sky (Edmunds)? These types of things usually involve taking down more than one of the enemy at the same time. Brilliant, and of course increadibly evil, move by the leftist. If what I think is true, the fallout will ruin Mr. Edmunds political career in addition to smearing Istook. Just Damn!!
328 posted on
10/04/2006 6:57:50 PM PDT by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: phoenix0468
332 posted on
10/04/2006 7:00:34 PM PDT by
Crim
(I may be a Mr "know it all"....but I'm also a Mr "forgot most of it"...)
To: phoenix0468
To: phoenix0468
You know, I'm of two minds on what Passionate America did. I don't think I would have named the former page who sent the IMs if I could have made my point - that he was 18 at the time some of the IMs were sent, and that ABC News has been sloppily reporting the whole thing in an attempt to obfuscate what House Republicans knew and when they knew it - without naming him. The former page doesn't deserve the hate that some may be throwing his way now.
On the other hand, I am absolutely sick of the MSM using unnamed sources and not telling us from whom they obtained their information in their politically charged reporting. We do deserve to know whether their unnamed sources have an ax to grind and for whom.
But to out someone who was a minor at the time some of the IMs were sent? I'm not so sure I like that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson