Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva
I haven't seen any information about the kid turning over the IMs years ago. The only claim of having made a report, years ago was by Kirk Fordham, the former staffer for Foley. His word is extremely doubtful, since he is also gay and was being pressured by the same rabid gay activists that set up the fake blog.

He has also changed his story. 

266 posted on 10/04/2006 6:02:05 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: All
FROM DRUDGE

ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER

FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD

Wed Oct 04 2006 20:32:06 ET

A posting on ABCNEWS.COM of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser.

The website PASSIONATE AMERICA detailed the startling exposure late Wednesday.

ABCNEWS said in a statement: "We go to great lengths to prevent the names of alleged sex crime victims from being revealed. On Friday there was a very brief technical glitch on our site which was overridden immediately. It is possible that during that very brief interval a screen name could have been captured. Reviews of the site since then show no unredacted screen names."

SEX CHAT WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD

On Tuesday ABC news released a high-impact instant message exchange between full-length and, as ABC explained, a young man "under the age of 18."

ABC headlined the story: "New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote"

But upon reviewing the records, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned, the young man was in fact over the age of 18 at the time of the exchange.

A network source explains exchanges with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place before and after the 18th birthday.

MORE...

267 posted on 10/04/2006 6:02:55 PM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

To: 1035rep

Kirk Fordham is gay too?

OMG!!


279 posted on 10/04/2006 6:10:14 PM PDT by JRochelle (You can believe what you want, but you can't have your own facts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

To: 1035rep

Homosexuals cannot hold a government security clearance for this specific reason - extortion.
However, the lowly-elected Princes can, and with the enemies of Islam at our door, this needs to be corrected ASAFP.


280 posted on 10/04/2006 6:10:40 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

To: 1035rep

I don't think that was the same kid, was it? I don't have tv, so I didn't see the kid who claimed to have exposed this years ago.


296 posted on 10/04/2006 6:17:57 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson