Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fhayek
My point was more in the realm of the court of public opinion.

So was I and here is where we differ in opinion and I may very well be wrong....but I believe that most people, over 40, think a 52 year old man hitting on an 18 year old is no different than a 16 year old.

And people over 40 vote!

The only think we can do is stress that IMs are different than Emails and that we did the right thing at the right time.

Anything else just keeps it in the news

112 posted on 10/04/2006 4:52:55 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: eddie willers

I'm over 40. There's a HUGE difference.


115 posted on 10/04/2006 4:53:59 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: eddie willers
16 is not legal, 18 is. Hitting on subordinates is a different problem, but there is a real (legal) distinction here, and that is not negligible.
118 posted on 10/04/2006 4:55:28 PM PDT by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson