Posted on 10/04/2006 1:58:14 PM PDT by Gribbit
Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag!
Now that that is out of the way I will reveal how I (and a few others) discovered Jordan Edmund was one of the former house pages that participated in sexually explicit instant messages with Rep. Mark Foley. Also I will explain to you why I believe it necessary to reveal Jordan Edmund's identity. You may not agree with my decision, but I hope to explain my reasoning by the end of this story.
Read More HERE!
He was never 16.
Seems pretty clear to me why he revealed the identity.
WHO OWNS THAT BLOG?????? That is THE question now!!
That is exactly why we need to keep this story alive until and after it is exposed that this was a Democratic set-up.
You really have some reading to catch up on.
The kid gave the government these IMs years ago, to report on his behavior. Read the bogus blog post from Drudge, and then things come into focus.
Oh I just WISH I were the Web sleuth that these guys are.
That's a huge leap. Gigantic.
If the guy was 18 then ABC misrepresented his legal status for a story.
And if it matters Major Garret is on Fox acting like a drama queen about Hatsert's staus.
No kidding!! I can't even get my brain wrapped around any of the timeline stuff....or ANYTHING with this for that matter. Maybe I'm getting long in the tooth, but most of this scandal is floating over my head.
I don't know what Drudge has, but you seem to be confusing IMs and emails, again. The Democrats were the only ones who knew of the IMs before this month.
"The kid went to Berkely, and he takes jobs with Republicans. It doesn't jive."
Well your preconceptions are that all Cal students are flaming moonbats and all Republican staffers are Republicans (let alone conservatives). Neither is true, in my experience.
Not one whit.
Denying reality a little? The MSM's spin has been Foley was preying upon young, underage congressional pages and had 'cybersex' with the same. If the ex-page was 18+, there would seemingly be no crime.
D.C.'s age of consent is 16, the same as page's minimum age. There was no actual sex. He was a page a year before the IMs and now was apparently 18, a clearly legal adult, at the time of the IMs.
Hastert only knew of an emails asking for a photo, how an ex-page weathered a hurricane and other things. No news organization felt the emails warranted any coverage and they knew of them years ago. Foley was disciplined. Now with the IMs having been revealed, Foley was gone immediately.
What don't I know?
There are 2 new points. First the "victim" was an adult at the time of the IMs'. Seacond, Ross has had these IMs' and documented on ABC's web site April 2003.
As someone who couldn't care less who is sleeping with or seducing whom), I'm gonna go out on a limb here. If the "object of affection" was a consenting adult of 18 at the time and was a willing participant (which he appears to be, given he responded and didn't block Foley), then...
Can we please quit calling Foley a pedophilic scumbag? That's just downright homophobic and insulting to the gay community.
I'm stunned
Major Garrett is a wimp. Fox is almost UNWATCHABLE anymore.
I think that was pretty obvious by the bombshell contained in that post.
I swear this stinks of the Clinton smear machine.
Oh, spare us. If it weren't for bloggers, people would never know that this "kid" is 21.
On Jordans web page he describes himself as a political operative. Isn't that interesting.
The point is that he wasn't and isn't a kid! So, go ahead, tsk tsk away, but the truth is out there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.