Exactly.
Posted on 10/04/2006 10:15:28 AM PDT by slowhand520
This iswhat David Corn is claiming..The link is being blitzed...
http://www.davidcorn.com/archives/2006/10/the_list_of_gay.php
I mean physically.
...probably doing more than thinking about it ...
You've got a couple of things happening here....
The Democrats were willing to play along with the Foley thing to hurt Repubs days before the election..
But the Radical Gay Movement has THIER OWN agenda, and they WANT to make the Election about gay issues...
This scares Dems shiiteless...
This thing is getting out of Democrat control, FAST, and I think they see what's coming.....
So what, are you going to call for him to leave Congress?
Pretty bad. I hope some conservatives don't take glee in this. What standards we are setting for Congress will become the standard for all of us one day.
Want your private life and all your failing exposed? Well that what this is coming too. Are you a single male teacher and some boy spreads a rumor against you? Be prepared for your computer to be seized and your reputation smashed for ever.
At times I think folks are missing the big picture here
It will not work because when they outed Cheney's daughter on television to viewers that were not aware she was gay before the 2004 election, it back fired. Most people do not like cheap dirty tricks like this. This will come back to haunt the donks.
The senator in question would be our least favorite senior senator from south carolina....
but she is not an elected official.
So you didn't mind Foley preying on teenage boys? Or Jim McGreevey appointing his lover as homeland security expert, and meeting men for sex in highway rest areas?
Of course Foley was pro-abortion and pro-gay, so both were worth voting against anyway, but don't think that the "private dysfunction" isn't going to cause other problems.
It maye provide a good indication of how many conservative "values voters" are out there. It may also drive business to various re-hab clinics as pols seek to escape the spotlight...
This will have the following results:
1. Outted Republicans will either cop to it, resign, or deny. Whichever choice is made, from now on, the GOP will be the party of straights and openly gay people who still hold similar views on defense, etc. (i.e. the smart ones).
2. People can whine about "diversity" all they want, but the fact will be that the Dems will be the party of gays and secularists, the Republicans the party of families and Christians.
3. When the dust settles, are the Democrats going to be happy about how people vote, in the privacy of the voting booth, when they don't have to worry what people think about them voting for the "party of white Christians"?
that was a blunt segment on FNC last night - imagine if someone on FNC has said that about Barney Frank - I assure you they would be issuing apologies today.
Exactly.
not because he is gay! I think he should retire because he is a massive spender a la Hastert...he is also a "go along to get along" Republican...who cares more about access to power than advancing the conservative agenda........
Isn't that what liberals are telling us?
Don't cities and communties have 'gay pride' week? 'gay/lesbian/bi/transgendered' weeks? Aren't they trying to get gay marriage accepted? Aren't they trying to ensure equal rights for all gays?
Is this like 'outing' Republicans who happen to be Hispanic? Jewish? Black? (But have never made that public)
What ever happened to 'don't ask, don't tell'?
good point.
Yep--ask Clarence Thomas.
When it comes down to knowing their are gays that are republican, so we don't vote or letting the donks control our fate with the WOT whcih may get alot of us killed, people will still vote republican and in very large numbers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.