Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North American Union Escapes Scrutiny
HumanEventsOnline ^ | Oct 03, 2006 | Tom Fitton

Posted on 10/04/2006 5:56:49 AM PDT by NapkinUser

Judicial Watch uncovered documents that shed new light on the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” announced by President Bush, former Mexico President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin on March 23, 2005.

The expressed goal of the partnership is to create “a safer, more prosperous North America” through enhanced cooperation between the United States, Mexico and Canada. Critics, however, charge that it is a veiled attempt to erase the borders between the countries, creating a “North American Union,” much like the “European Union,” with a common currency. (Under such an arrangement, the U.S. would obviously sacrifice aspects of its sovereignty.) Little has been reported about the inner workings of the partnership in the mainstream press, which is one reason why Judicial Watch decided to investigate.

Our investigations team is still in the process of analyzing the documents released to Judicial Watch in response to its Freedom of Information Act request. But what we have uncovered so far is intriguing. The partnership’s “working groups,” include officials from 10 federal agencies, including Commerce, State, and Homeland Security. These officials, in cooperation with representatives from Mexico and Canada, are addressing a wide variety of topics behind closed-doors, including the movement of goods between countries, traveler security, energy, environment and health.

Some of the more disturbing material, we found in documents concerning the North American Competitiveness Council. The council consists of 30 members, 10 each from the United States, Mexico and Canada, and is responsible for making recommendations to the partnership on a variety of topics. Judicial Watch uncovered its recommendations and meeting minutes. To give you a sampling of just how dangerous this partnership could become, here is what the council recommended on border enforcement: “A reasonable grace period should be established at border crossings, during which time people lacking documents are educated about their options and allowed to pass.” Can you imagine the chaos created at the U.S. border with Mexico if such an insane policy were ever enacted?

While these documents raise many additional questions, one thing is clear about the North American partnership announced just over a year ago: This is not simply a theoretical exercise. These “working groups” are spending your tax money to this project. The project is not about the North American capitals “synchronizing their watches” and making sure they have the right numbers to call in case of emergency. It is about changes in policy and regulations on a host of important issues–including border security. And it’s all happening without any fanfare or much media scrutiny. Judicial Watch will continue to push for transparency in this process.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: nau

1 posted on 10/04/2006 5:56:50 AM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Yeah, but Judical Watch--you are a has-been...

Sat on your [bleeps] way, way too long!

2 posted on 10/04/2006 6:09:36 AM PDT by 100-Fold_Return (Those who would bash Osteen/Warren would support HAMAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
"“A reasonable grace period should be established at border crossings, during which time people lacking documents are educated about their options and allowed to pass.” Can you imagine the chaos created at the U.S. border with Mexico if such an insane policy were ever enacted?"

Yes, I can imagine. The naysayers will be along any minute now with their tinfoil jokes. This is the problem, the Constitution is the fundamental law of the land. Congress should have exclusive say on the border matter and be accountable to their constituents. Anything these 30 flunkies say on the border issue ought to be void. But that is not going to happen. More and more these organizations will sprout up and lay down guidelines that will be the defacto law of the land overruling the Constitution. The People have totally lost control of its government. As a result the government will acquire total control over The People, the Constitution being a dead letter.

3 posted on 10/04/2006 6:18:19 AM PDT by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jason_b

I wish that they would find the papers from the MARCH 5th meeting. It spelled it right out.


4 posted on 10/04/2006 10:33:25 AM PDT by veracityfirst (liberals are so open-minded that their brains have fallen out...oh my...yuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson