Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

So this is the GOP strategy? Question the timing? Because---shock and amazement--political opponents may have held the info for max impact? First, what a shocker. Second, who cares? What's worse? What Foley did is worse.


14 posted on 10/04/2006 5:23:53 AM PDT by Huck (There is a $2.00 service charge for this tagline---do you still wish to proceed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

If I am right about my post #12, then the democrats are just as bad as Foley and will pay dearly at the polls.


15 posted on 10/04/2006 5:25:57 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

So you are willing to turn over the country to the Al Qaida party over this???? I am not!!!


22 posted on 10/04/2006 5:35:05 AM PDT by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Foley got the boot, is being investigated and if he broke any laws will prosecuted. I think he is scum. Having said that, there are much more important things facing this future of this country than one man being a sick pervert, but the dems would like us to believe otherwise because they have no answers for dealing with these issues. So,yes, it's important to point out the timing of why and by whom this information was released. We can not let them be in charge of this country.
33 posted on 10/04/2006 5:50:06 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
So this is the GOP strategy? Question the timing? Because---shock and amazement--political opponents may have held the info for max impact? First, what a shocker. Second, who cares? What's worse? What Foley did is worse.

I agree with the sentiment, but the GOP seems to be playing this pretty straight.

I haven't heard Rush on this subject, but Hannity is definitely questioning the timing of the release as are most of the posters on this thread. Hannity can do what he wants. But I'm basically with you on this. Politics ain't beanbags. Foley's actions since the first story broke are as close to an admission as you get these days.

My concern is that this kind of stuff goes on the internet every day, and now that Foley has lowered the bar (so to speak) the next Pol nailed for this will barely raise an eyebrow. And so it goes.

52 posted on 10/04/2006 6:24:47 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

Foley was hitting on 16 year old young men. The males I've known, including me, were NOT sexual children at 16. I've read one of the teens met Foley in a gay bar. 16 year old males don't go to a gay bar because of their selction of imported beers.

Two males hitting on each other is disgusting - but this is NOT pedophilia! This is homosexuality.

If Foley had hit on me when I was that age, I'd have told him to get his creepy @$$ away from me before I broke every bone in his body. I didn't need Congress to pass a law to protect me from old men.

Damn, but we have a lot of wussies running around...


58 posted on 10/04/2006 6:47:18 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Timing? If this is truly about "protecting the children," why did the dems sit on this information for so long?

This shows them for the absolute hypcrites they are. They don't give a darn about these pages, because most liberals think teenagers have a right to consent.

125 posted on 10/04/2006 9:34:36 AM PDT by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson