Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

2 posted on 10/03/2006 2:52:54 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blam
Could also be a new ride at 6 Flags.

4 posted on 10/03/2006 2:57:12 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Fling me to the moon...

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
14 posted on 10/03/2006 3:11:15 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The COVENANT won't be pleased that we humans are developing our own 'Ring'. [HALO ranting off]


19 posted on 10/03/2006 3:24:56 PM PDT by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Two undesirable things would be happening as the launch sled circled for hours: heat would build up; and increasing amounts of energy would be wasted on overcoming air resistance.

Perhaps a more optimal design would incorporate a larger sled, and a larger rocket and more rocket fuel. This would enable a quicker launch, at lower speeds & lower g forces. The rocket could provide the final boost at very high altitudes, where there is very little air resistance.


25 posted on 10/03/2006 3:31:58 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The lateral g-forces would be enormous. Most satellites are designed with a single direction high g-load in mind for launch.

Not sure how this would play out. The Moon is a different animal though. For years, there have been proposed designs for a mass driver to lift payloads to space.


30 posted on 10/03/2006 3:52:54 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Air resistance is the major problem. First it will bleed energy off the projectile, and second it will cause extreme aerodynamic heating. A solution would be a hollow tube reaching at least five miles high that could hold a vacuum, ten miles even better. The tube could be built along the side of a mountain, but it would have to go even higher than any mountain. This project is somewhat similar to the space elevator as far as technology.


66 posted on 10/04/2006 8:41:47 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson