Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Denies 'Light' Cigarettes Request
AP ^ | 10/3/6

Posted on 10/03/2006 9:56:15 AM PDT by SmithL

A federal judge has denied a request by tobacco companies to let them keep marketing "light" and "low tar" cigarettes until an appeal is settled in their case.

U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler ruled in August that the cigarette makers violated racketeering laws and misled the public about the health consequences of smoking.

Kessler ordered them to stop marketing light and low-tar cigarettes and said the companies must make public statements about nicotine addiction and the health effects of smoking.

The companies immediately asked Kessler to hold off on enforcing that order until the appeal was complete,

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
Tyrants in Black Robes
1 posted on 10/03/2006 9:56:15 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Tyrants, indeed.


2 posted on 10/03/2006 10:00:33 AM PDT by L98Fiero (Evil is an exact science)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: SmithL

The presumption is that ordinary people are incapable of conducting their own affairs... that the invisible hand does not work ... that nobody read or believed the #1 publication of post-WWII (Readers Digest) that was on a rampage against smoking from the first copy I read in the 40's and that the majority of churches including both evangelical/fundamentalist and mainstream Methodist types that preached against smoking are irrelevant.

The presumption is that the government is needed to be our mommy our whole life and take care of us our whole life and not let us to grow up and make our own mistakes.


4 posted on 10/03/2006 10:02:10 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Besides, anybody who has smoked a Marlboro Red and a Marlboro Light, KNOWS there is a difference.


5 posted on 10/03/2006 10:02:43 AM PDT by L98Fiero (Evil is an exact science)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A federal judge has denied a request by tobacco companies to let them keep marketing

Very odd.
6 posted on 10/03/2006 10:06:42 AM PDT by kinoxi (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; SheLion

health-nazi ping!


7 posted on 10/03/2006 10:31:04 AM PDT by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

She looks like a joyless old commie bitch.


8 posted on 10/03/2006 10:31:55 AM PDT by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

Yep, it's tough to say they're the same thing.


9 posted on 10/03/2006 10:33:47 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Based on the logic (or lack of) for this "light" cigarette issue, I can now smoke 4 packs of Marlboro reds a day and it is no different than smoking one single Merit Light.


10 posted on 10/03/2006 10:48:39 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I gigged your peace frog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The implication of a "Light" cigarette is that it is less dangerous than a conventional cigarette. If the tobacco companies have research that demonstrates this to be true, they should produce it. I suspect that it is a fantasy, however.

To my mind this is all just tinkering with the machinery of death. The government should just ban the damn things, but will never willingly give up the tax revenues cigarettes provide.


11 posted on 10/03/2006 11:06:43 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; Mears; ...

They're coming out of the woodwork today..........


The problem I have with the entire idea of this suit, is the GOVERNMENT OK'd the use of "light" and "low tar" years ago........so how in heck can it be racketerring if it were government sanctioned?

I know, I know, rhetorical question.


12 posted on 10/03/2006 11:24:38 AM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
They're coming out of the woodwork today..........

I noticed.

13 posted on 10/03/2006 11:28:31 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Be careful what you ask for, and even more careful what you demand. Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

I'm glad I have to get off line here in a few minutes for a few hours........SHEESH.


14 posted on 10/03/2006 11:30:01 AM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

"so how in heck can it be racketerring if it were government sanctioned?"

More like government mandated. The government is now punishing folks for obeying the law. The funny thing is that many FReepers will celebrate this march towards tyranny.


15 posted on 10/03/2006 11:31:13 AM PDT by CSM ("When you stop lying about us, we'll stop telling the truth about you." No Truce With Kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CSM
The funny thing is that many FReepers will celebrate this march towards tyranny.

It's only funny in a very sad way.

The increasing number of nanny-state embracers on FR is getting downright scary.

16 posted on 10/03/2006 11:37:51 AM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Do-Over:

Judge Gladys Kessler
Judge Kessler was appointed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in July 1994. She received a B.A. from Cornell University and an LL.B. from Harvard Law School. Following graduation, Judge Kessler was employed by the National Labor Relations Board, served as Legislative Assistant to a U.S. Senator and a U.S. Congressman, worked for the New York City Board of Education, and then opened a public interest law firm. In June 1977, she was appointed Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. From 1981 to 1985, Judge Kessler served as Presiding Judge of the Family Division and was a major architect of one of the nation’s first Multi-Door Courthouses. She served as President of the National Association of Women Judges from 1983 to 1984, and now serves on the Executive Committee of the ABA’s Conference of Federal Trial Judges and the U.S. Judicial Conference's Committee on Court Administration and Management.

17 posted on 10/03/2006 11:42:24 AM PDT by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Thats really her huh?

Thought i was looking at a stock photo of "The Church Lady" from SNL for a moment there...


18 posted on 10/03/2006 11:45:40 AM PDT by HonorsDaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Hey - if you dont like em, dont smoke em.

Otherwise, just shut up ok? I can make my own decisions on how to best kill myself, er i mean, enjoy life thankyouverymuch...


19 posted on 10/03/2006 11:46:40 AM PDT by HonorsDaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

i thought the implication of a light cigarette was a lighter flavour.


20 posted on 10/03/2006 12:03:09 PM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson