Not a good bet at all. The IM's are causing you to monday morning quarterback and imagine there was more to be dug up. But they are old and dubiously sourced (to say the least). Foley didn't deny them, but what good would that do anyway? Also the pages themselves have not said bad things about Foley, on the contrary, they have said he was ok.
I would have been very happy had such questions come up with a "no," and it certainly would have insulated the leadership from the circus that's going on now. It would have been straightforward: we asked, we couldn't find any corrorobation, and that's that.
Also the pages themselves have not said bad things about Foley, on the contrary, they have said he was ok.
Check out one example - and I think there are others out there - in the LA Times.