Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave S
I don't think it has to be though. There are tactics that can be used to divert attention back to the important issues. Like reminding voters of what happened with Franks, Studds, et al., and how there stories were handled so very differently. After all Foley is GONE.

It can be done but the Congresscritters are gonna have to be prepared to answer in just that fashion, not some long drawn out long winded semi apologetic answer.
73 posted on 10/02/2006 11:39:05 PM PDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: singfreedom
There are tactics that can be used to divert attention back to the important issues. Like reminding voters of what happened with Franks, Studds, et al.,

All that is likely do is convince voters that we are attempting to create moral equivalency and that we are just as bad as the Dems on moral issues. Talking about eliminating the Page Program because the adult leaders of our country cant be trusted with children is stupid. Tell LaHood to shut the ---- up. LaHood is close to Hastert. What the heck was he thinking?

94 posted on 10/03/2006 6:33:02 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson