Winnie (and maybe Nelson) will be delighted
 |
Posted on 10/02/2006 9:17:30 PM PDT by johnwayne
Johannesburg - One million white South Africans - almost a fifth - have left the country in the past ten years.
This figure was released last week in a report from the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR).
Frans Cronjé, who compiled the report, said it was especially crime and affirmative action which had driven a fifth of South Africa's white population out of the country.
He did an analysis of Statistics South Africa's Household Surveys between 1995 and 2005, emigration figures and other reliable estimates on population numbers.
Cronjé said the results left himself and his colleagues dumbfounded.
"When we drew the graphs we saw that almost a whole generation of white South Africans are not here anymore."
Young people, children leaving
The SAIRR's population pyramid of white South Africans show a definite loss of young people and children under the age of ten.
The figures for 2005 put the number of white South Africans in the country at 4.3 million, 841 000 fewer than the 5.2 million of 1995.
Cronjé predicts that the white population would continue to shrink, and, he said, the situation would have a far-reaching impact on the economy.
"The white population is getting older, which means the white taxpayers are only going to contribute to the economy for the next twenty years. There would have to be a huge influx of skilled workers to fill this gap. This, unfortunately, is not the case."
Due to the inequalities of the past, the education of most of the black children is still not on par to fill these gaps.
Last year, for example, only 3 000 black learners passed matric with higher grade mathematics, said Cronjé.
Economically productive
Most of the white emigrants are economically productive people, said Marco Macfarlane, co-author of the report.
However, in the last decade the black economically productive population grew by 81%. Some of these people have slot into the high-income group, where black people make up a third of the top earners.
Whites, however, still account for half of this group, where Indians and coloureds make up 7% and 6% of the high-income group respectively.
The rest of the black entrants to the labour market are busy in the informal sector, which do not necessarily contribute to the tax income.
"Black people are entering the economy at a stiff pace, but of the economically active middle class (the country's biggest tax contributors), blacks only account for 1%."
Macfarlane said crime and affirmative action are the top reasons for the exodus of whites.
More whites going to leave
"And because the crime figures are not going to decline rapidly and affirmative action is to continue, more whites are going to leave.
"The young people reckon they are being punished for what happened in the previous dispensation. They are furious, because they feel they had no part in it," said Macfarlane.
According to the report the emigrants are between 20 and 40 years old.
"This is the group that have children and help grow the population, but now they're getting their children overseas. And they don't come back. That means the white population is going to continue to shrink."
The decline in the white population in the decade to 2005 is estimated at 16.1%.
Totally bankrupt culture. Nuff said!
Oh well, when the whites leave they can go back to necklacing.
What's so shocking about this? You shut the entrepeneurs down and what do they expect?
That sentence doesn't even make sense.
In the workforce, you have a one month grace period to blame all problems on the guy that just left. Afterwards, it's all yours. How long does whitey have to take the blame in SA? Last one out please turn the lights out.
Where's the link to the original article?
Winnie (and maybe Nelson) will be delighted
| |
I posted it at #5
How long before SA devolves into total dysfunction?
When I read the title of the thread, I thought it was saying "San Antonio". No wonder I couldn't do the math.
I'm guessing that the answer will be proportional to the amount of foreign aid they receive, both intellectual and otherwise. Even with their incredible wealth of gold, diamonds and other resources they seem unable to make a go of it on their own (without breathtaking levels of crime, mayhem and socioeconomic problems).
This reminds me of the 'white flight' that occurs in many US "inner cities" when the social fabric starts to unravel due to the effects of certain new populations.
Same could be said about California.
Smart. They are looking at Zimbabwe and seeing what South Africa will look like in ten years (or less). Those who straggle will end up with nothing. "Snooze, you lose."
You're quite welcome :-) If that's the worst thing that happens at FR today then it hasn't been such a bad day, methinks :-)
 |
I don't think it has much to do with race, frankly. It's liberalism that allows the sores to fester beyond redemption. So in a sense, minority populations cut their own throats by voting for commie douche bags at every chance.
Rhodesia, the former "breadbasket of Africa", kicked out whitey in 1980 and whitey is still taking the blame for Zimbabwe's deterioration and chaos 26 years later. The answer to your question is: forever.
That is possible, if so, write off Africa.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.