[VictoryGal]

> If someone sent the non sexual e mails that were printed to a sixteen year old son of mine I would strangle him with his own intestines.

Thank you. "Non sexual" indeed. I can't believe there are actually a few FReepers here calling those creepy things "innocent".

[muawiyah]

The meaning of the emails, sent a year ago, is only really apparant, and actionable, once you know about the Instant Messages, sent three years ago.

Then the pedophile grooming process becomes apparant.

So, for anybody to think the emails were exceptionally "creepy" they'd already had to have knowledge of the Instant Messages.

I'm just guessing you knew about them a long time ago but simply failed to report them to appropriate law enforcement.

[StarFan]

If someone sent the non sexual e mails that were printed to a sixteen year old son of mine I would strangle him with his own intestines.

Thank you. "Non sexual" indeed. I can't believe there are actually a few FReepers here calling those creepy things "innocent".

I don't believe any FReeper said the IM's were innocent. Beware you're falling into the trap the Dems and MSM are laying down -- confusing the e-mails and the IM's. The e-mails were overly friendly, the IM's were overly disgusting.