To: madprof98
The point of the article is valid, except that in DC 16 is age of consent, so it's not a matter of 'underage', only of abuse of authority.
2 posted on
10/02/2006 2:49:30 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: The_Reader_David
Time we start warning boys and young men. These predators can't reproduce within their disgusting relationships so they have to prey on someone else's boys to increase their numbers. It's sick!
weegee posted this in another related topic:
http://www.archive.org/details/boys_beware
5 posted on
10/02/2006 2:56:16 PM PDT by
Sister_T
(Defend America ... Defeat DEMOCRATS!!!! Go Ken Blackwell Go!!)
To: The_Reader_David
It is a matter of "underage" now, since Foley sponsored legislation to make it a crime to solicit sex via internet w/ those under 18.
This is "News of the Weird" level irony.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson