Doesn't it say that "the Page" in question wasn't a page when he was contacted by Foley?
Let's follow this logically if this happened three years ago and after this young man was a page, and the young man in question is 22 years old today, he had to be nineteen when it happened?
The Sixteen year old number comes from when he was allowed to be a page, not when he stopped being a page but when he could become a page.
The lie here is one of omission, the media isn't telling us how old he was when he recieved the "IMs" or the e-mails, only that pages start at 16 years old.
The media preys on public ignorance by using innuendo and incomplete reporting.
Good job! You caught that ommission, too.
Good point