Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Canard
Why does it bother you so much that, in British usage (for obvious historical reasons) it tends to be used for people of Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi descent?

Becasue the term "Asian" means anyone from Asia - hundreds of different cultures. Why do Brits narrow it down to just three? Especially when actually referring to Muslims? Most Asians are Hindus or Buddhists - NOT Muslims, so why use the word "Asian" when you are only referring to Pakistanis or Indians?

That's like referring to Brits, Greeks, Russians, Swedes, Irish, Germans, Italians, Hungarians and Serbians all as "Europeans".

While it is true that a Swede is a European - it is NOT true that a European is just a Swede.

Same thing with "Asian" and "Muslim".

65 posted on 10/02/2006 1:41:02 PM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Tokra

"Becasue the term "Asian" means anyone from Asia - hundreds of different cultures. Why do Brits narrow it down to just three?"

Because those bits of Asia are the bits we used to own and from where there was immigration into the UK in the postwar period. Hence most people's experience of someone from Asia would have been from one of those countries and hence the usage.

"That's like referring to Brits, Greeks, Russians, Swedes, Irish, Germans, Italians, Hungarians and Serbians all as "Europeans"."

Yes it is. Which people from the US do regularly! Why do American police sometimes describe someone as 'black' when they are actually of Jamaican descent?


78 posted on 10/02/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson