[ArGee]

That leaves the other 20 percent of pregnant minors, or the less-than-ideal scenario. These are the most vulnerable girls, the girls who tend to come from family situations that are unhealthy, unaccepting or violent.

First, is there any support for that 80/20 thing?

Second, in the scenarios where the children don't go to the parents, if there's a screw up and she has to go to the emergency room, is the group that's fighting this proposition going to foot the bill at the hospital, or are they going to ask the parents to foot the bill - parent's who are not going to have a say in the activity that created the problem?

Shalom.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Or the girl gets an abortion without telling her parents, and slips into a spiral of self-destructive behavior, including despression, alcohol and drug abuse, promiscuity (all too familiar, fill in the blanks) and the parents are kept in the dark, wondering what the hell is going on..

Parents aren't supposed to know even about the most drastic, irreversibly destructive things some "doctor" is going to do to their girls; they're just stupposed to deal with the wreckage (and, oh yeah, pay the bills.)

[GOP Poet]

That leaves the other 20 percent of pregnant minors, or the less-than-ideal scenario. These are the most vulnerable girls, the girls who tend to come from family situations that are unhealthy, unaccepting or violent.

This makes is sound as if to carry and birth a child is abuse itself.

So if an 'abusive', or 'unhealthy', or 'unaccepting' [MASSIVE, LIBERAL BARF WORD!]parent does not allow a child to abort the baby, it is abusive. This is one thing they are insinuating. It is somewhat subtle, but still there.

By the way abusive is very subjective to these liberals. I am sure to a liberal an abusive parent is one who will not allow the child to abort the baby--forces the child to have the baby [AS GOD WOULD WITH ALL PREGANT FEMALES. I MIGHT ADD!--Is God abusive, unhealthy, or unaccepting?]

And people who would buy the lack of parental notification otherwise subtly begin to believe this is abuse too without realizing it. They think they are just agreeing that they don't want children to get beat up or emotionally abused. No one wants to see a child be physically, mentally or sexually abused.

This is why pro-abortionists continue to use this exceptional case group as the whole reason to eliminate the right of parental notification. It is a double-edged sword of manipulation, that works as a subtle evil wedge, between holiness and evil. The underlying insinuation once again is so subtle--that to make a child carry a baby is abuse. There you have it.

This is the message all people of my generation and the following generations grew up with (after the boomers). Besides being an inconvenience to women. Many of these minors that grow up to be women find having to birth a child that is unplanned as self abuse or partner abuse (if the other party insists they have it.) What a complete and utter mind fu--. /rant