Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lunatic Fringe

Hello Lunatic Fringe, guess what! It's not supposed to, hence the name "Trans-Texas Corridor". The idea is to route all of this "trans-Texas" traffic onto a highway system where it is routed around the major cities to help alleviate metropolitan auto traffic and cut down on smog to boot. You might want to read up on it.


23 posted on 10/02/2006 7:13:47 PM PDT by TexPride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: TexPride
The idea is to route all of this "trans-Texas" traffic onto a highway system where it is routed around the major cities to help alleviate metropolitan auto traffic and cut down on smog to boot.

Fine. Then why the commuter and high-speed rail lines??

I'm not going to drive an 1 1/2 hours to get to a high speed train station East of Dallas to travel to Austin, where I then have to rent a car to drive another 45 minutes to get to Austin. I could drive straight through from Dallas faster.

And why is commuter light rail needed in non-metro areas? Who needs commuter rail in Killeen or Tyler?

The whole project is an obscene waste of money.

24 posted on 10/02/2006 9:36:02 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: TexPride

More....

If this were simply a highway project, I'd be fine with it. But it's not.


25 posted on 10/02/2006 9:37:25 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson