Replies

The article describes in painstaking detail how the GOP leadership took the matter very seriously, and investigated in an official manner the emails that were turned over to them and made a determination that they were weird but innocuous.

The sexually explicit IMs - as opposed to the emails - were not revealed until later.

72 posted on 10/02/2006 8:51:15 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)

you have to be specific as to when.

The IMs were revealed last week.
(exactly the day after the name could not be changed on the ballot)

48 hours later, foley was gone.

"The article describes in painstaking detail how the GOP leadership took the matter very seriously, and investigated in an official manner the emails that were turned over to them and made a determination that they were weird but innocuous."

I would happy if GOP leadership simply says we investigated and we missed some stuff. Now that additional information has come forward we have dealt with it in the most vigorous manner. On the other hand, to go down the road of arguing against the behavior of Democratic operatives is redundant. More important, it commits conservatives to the track of moral relativism that we so bitterly oppose. I do wish you would think about that.