Skip to comments.
Erwin Chemerinsky:
Legislating Violations of the Constitution
wapo ^
| Saturday, September 30, 2006; 12:00 AM
| Erwin Chemerinsky
Posted on 10/01/2006 5:14:44 PM PDT by Checkers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: ThePythonicCow
21
posted on
10/01/2006 6:08:52 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: Checkers
Excuse me, Professor--where did the Constitution allow provision of litigants in ANY suit at law with free attorneys on the federal taxpayers' dime? I must have missed that!
22
posted on
10/01/2006 6:09:34 PM PDT
by
LibertarianInExile
(Mark Foley is what happens when personal character isn't relevant to voters or party leaders.)
To: Alia
He's got a slight Marty Feldman thing going on with his eyes.
23
posted on
10/01/2006 6:09:52 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: Dionysiusdecordealcis
"He's a real peace o' work"
Work?
24
posted on
10/01/2006 6:10:29 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: ARE SOLE
And he sounds like Michael Jackson when he speaks.
25
posted on
10/01/2006 6:11:37 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: Deo volente
26
posted on
10/01/2006 6:11:53 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: YOUGOTIT
27
posted on
10/01/2006 6:12:19 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: mirkwood
Smoke 'em if you got 'em.
28
posted on
10/01/2006 6:12:51 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: LibertarianInExile
You didn't miss a thing...
29
posted on
10/01/2006 6:13:30 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: Gay State Conservative
With all the legislation from Congress that violates the Constitution, Mr. Chemerinsky bitches about this one?
30
posted on
10/01/2006 6:15:52 PM PDT
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: Alia
Tell me what he was involved in lately -- why does that name ring a bell?
31
posted on
10/01/2006 6:17:16 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(Release the Joe Wilson Niger Report!!!!)
To: Checkers
32
posted on
10/01/2006 6:22:51 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: Howlin
33
posted on
10/01/2006 6:23:42 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: Checkers; Alia
34
posted on
10/01/2006 6:25:58 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(Release the Joe Wilson Niger Report!!!!)
To: Checkers
FYI: Another name for BARF is Regurgitate.</p>
To: Checkers
. . .the First Amendment's separation of church and state. He can't be referring to the United States Constitution.
36
posted on
10/01/2006 6:28:23 PM PDT
by
TravisBickle
(Are you talkin' to me?)
To: Checkers
undermines enforcement of the First Amendment's separation of church and state How can you undermine enforcement of a non-existent prinicple? There is NO separation of church and state!
37
posted on
10/01/2006 7:49:03 PM PDT
by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: YOUGOTIT
That is a flat out lie. The bill keeps the ACLU from using my tax money to destroy my country and to support the Islamic terrorist. Is this really the bill that will cut off the ACLU from our tax dollars?
If so, it may be the most important victory of the decade - does it now have to go the the Senate?
38
posted on
10/01/2006 7:52:02 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
To: Checkers
> We know he's a liberal. <
No, he's a socialist.
39
posted on
10/01/2006 8:11:19 PM PDT
by
Hawthorn
To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP; dixiechick2000; Grampa Dave; Interesting Times; ...
40
posted on
10/01/2006 8:13:10 PM PDT
by
devolve
(-REFRESH- GRAPHICS---- --CITGO--HUGO--NOGO--NUKO--OSAMO--)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
