To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
It should be pointed out that the soft tissue wasn't soft when found.
When they dissolved the mineral deposits in the tissues, the authors were left with a flexible, stretchy material threaded with what looked like blood vessels. source
I believe this omission has caused a certain amount of controversy here on FR in the past.
8 posted on
10/01/2006 8:24:40 AM PDT by
Hoplite
To: Hoplite
I believe this omission has caused a certain amount of controversy here on FR in the past. Just a bit.
10 posted on
10/01/2006 8:26:28 AM PDT by
null and void
(Barking at the staff & growling disapproval are OK... chasing cats during lunch makes you look bad..)
To: Hoplite
Hmmm, interesting. Good points.
13 posted on
10/01/2006 8:48:00 AM PDT by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
("A litany of complaints is not a plan." - GW Bush, referring to DNC's lack of a platform on ANYTHING)
To: Hoplite
I don't care what controversy this has caused. Until T-rex's start throwing Jeeps around on a tropical island, I won't be satisfied.
The tissue doesn't have DNA? Excuses, excuses. Tsk, Tsk.
18 posted on
10/01/2006 9:02:22 AM PDT by
burzum
(Despair not! I shall inspire you by charging blindly on!--Minsc, BG2)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson