Question for Rahm: Which is worse?
A) Forcing a Congressman to resign after learning that weird emails are supplemented by newly revealed text messages to a 16-year old boy page.
Or
B) You defending a President who put his penis in the mouth of a 19-year old girl intern in the Oval Office.
So what is Rahm saying, that the Republicans should have thought the worse because Foley is gay? Is he implying that absent any complaints that the Republicans should have taken it upon themselves to conduct a full investigation because of his sexual preference?
The Democrats make me sick. Beneath these so called champions of civil rights and equality is complete contempt for the groups they claim to represent.