“Newer isn't necessarily better.”
Bullets, barrels and electronics are old hat. What’s new is how they were put together, and that was sheer genius.
“This system requires the barrel to be removed and then returned to the factory for reloading.”
New ideas have teething problems but we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bath water.
“Would you buy a pistol whose barrel had to removed and then reloaded at the factory? Seriously, this is not a good idea. It's not economically feasible.”
Would you buy an auto-mobile that has to be filled with gas in order to keep going? Seriously, this is not a good idea. It’s not economically feasible. Give me horses any day!
Just as cars and planes no longer require crank starting, and ships no longer need sails, this new technology with outgrow its teething problems. You stick with horses and muskets; I’ll take a jet with smart guns.
Removing the barrel and sending it back to the factory for reloading IS NOT A TEETHING PROBLEM. That's exactly how the system was designed. It can't be reloaded by the owner.
You got that?
Now I'm going to ask you again. Would you but a gun that after shooting had to be send back to the factory just so you could use it again?