Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5

“That system would never be economical for clearing land mines.”

It’s easy to kick a new idea in its formation. It was easy to say, “Man will never fly!”
Providing proof that man could never fly is more difficult.

“I think you should sit back and do the math as to how much it would cost to clear a one acre field.”
I’ll leave that to Metal Storm, but if you have any inside dope . . .

“The Metal Storm system was outmoded by 1860's artillery using cannister rounds.”
That sounds very familiar. “Who needs automobiles? We have horses!”
You’re comparing tons of equipment, personal, transport and cratered landscapes with a small machine, a handful of people and a little land damage. It’s like comparing a single atomic bomb with forests of ancient trebuchets. Even if they did achieve the same result, consider the differences in size, expense, personnel, damage, etc.


29 posted on 10/02/2006 6:28:43 PM PDT by Rob Larrikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Rob Larrikin
Newer isn't necessarily better.

This system requires the barrel to be removed and then returned to the factory for reloading.

Would you buy a pistol whose barrel had to removed and then reloaded at the factory? Seriously, this is not a good idea. It's not economically feasible.
30 posted on 10/02/2006 6:33:55 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson