[ElkGroveDan]

Well, I am glad to hear that my campaign donations to the Republicans aren't paying your salary, for you to use it to undermine the Republicans. But your posts stand alone, they are promoting Arnold's defeat, and Angelides' victory.

Bingo. I've finally nailed who you remind me of. Margaret from the Dennis the Menace comic strip.

You sound like an 8 year old little girl with those dumb endless "You are campaigning for Angelides!" arguments.

[FairOpinion]

""You are campaigning for Angelides!"


===

Well, the shoe fits. THAT is what you and some of your cohorts are doing, exactly.

[goldstategop]

The lesser of two liberals argument is one that places symbolism over substance. I'm not interested in Arnold's Republican affiliation but in the actual nature of his policies. For some people, his having an "R" legitimizes acts they would oppose if a Democrat had done them. For me, its produced the opposite reaction - to oppose his candidacy because it damages conservative values and beliefs. Supporting a party ought to be more than about the name on the ballot; it ought to be about advancing its ideology and platform. That is why parties exist to win elections.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus