To: blam
Loran beacons are still working and I assume they still will be in 2011.
They're ground based and are quite reliable to within a few meters.
This will cause about as much havoc as Y2K did, aka not much at all.
11 posted on
09/29/2006 2:48:41 PM PDT by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: HEY4QDEMS
Loran beacons are still working and I assume they still will be in 2011.
I still use mine for trips out into the Gulf of Mexico.
People look at me like I have 3 heads when I tell them I still use Loran for navigation.
37 posted on
09/29/2006 4:00:47 PM PDT by
WackySam
("There's room for all God's creatures- right next to the taters")
To: HEY4QDEMS
Loran beacons are still working and I assume they still will be in 2011. They're ground based and are quite reliable to within a few meters. This will cause about as much havoc as Y2K did, aka not much at all. LORAN is in the process of a rather impressive upgrade under the current proposal. Stunning accuracy for 100KHz signal. To contain massive data in the pulse "manipulations". All with land-based unmanned XMTR stations that won't be the expected 1st thing taken out in a heavy conflict, like most of the GPS birds will most certainly be. Portables stations can be reset in hours instead of years to put up a new sat. Not line of sight, 100KHz is. Cheap, reliable, accurate, rapid XMTR replenishment, backup nav.
I hope the USCG approves it or the DOD picks it up.
38 posted on
09/29/2006 4:05:21 PM PDT by
USCG SimTech
(Honored to serve since '71)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson