One article says the newspaper interviewed the kid last Nov. but decided not to run the story til now......seems Foley would have heard rumors or something if this kid and his handlers were out shopping the story.
"One article says the newspaper interviewed the kid last Nov. but decided not to run the story til now......seems Foley would have heard rumors or something if this kid and his handlers were out shopping the story."
Can you find the link? Now this kid was not the same kid that he sent sexually explicit PM's to....correct? How long did the house ethics committee know about this? Something smells here. If this was something the dems held on to until now..they put other children potentially in danger for political purposes and the American people would find that despicable.
Foley is slime. That said, why would anyone hold back the story if it were an obvious case of child sexual abuse? Were they not giving this pervert the chance to contact other children, thereby putting them in danger?
I am NOT deflecting blame. If true, Foley is to blame and be punished appropriately. But the people (dems, media???) that kept this under wraps for any amount of time due to best political timing should be locked up for conspiracy, aiding and abetting or something to that effect.