For those people who have said, "We don't need a constitutional amendment defining marriage as one man and one woman!"...well, here you go. This is why we do. At the Federal level AND at the individual state levels.
}:-)4
And then they will go back to Rhode Island and sue the state to recognize their marriage, right?
For those people who have said, "We don't need a constitutional amendment defining marriage as one man and one woman!"...well, here you go. This is why we do. At the Federal level AND at the individual state levels.
The Senate screwed us on that already and now that it looks like we will lose at least a seat. I think for the next two years anyway there won't be a Marriage Constitutional Amendment passed. We lost our chance and now may never get it again. Thanks RINOS!!!!!