Hardly. You are pretty lonely on this thread in case you haven't noticed. Even the Admin Mod didn't agree with you.
She wasn't raped.
Forced against her will under threat of force. Sounds like rape to anyone with an IQ above 85.
[Someone please tell me why a conservative forum has so many liber(al)tarian sex-worker apologists.]
Someone please tell me why a conservative forum has this poster who keeps apologizing for some cop who raped a woman.
Perhaps in your world, right and wrong are decided by popular vote. Not in mine. And, Admin Mod? LOL. This is the first I've heard of them being the litmus test.
Forced against her will under threat of force. Sounds like rape to anyone with an IQ above 85.
Let's try this again: If she had said "No," he wouldn't have forced her to do anything. He would have arrested her. In other words—this is important so, think about it carefully—she consented. That was her choice. She was blackmailed, extorted, etc. but, since she consented, she was not raped. The court agrees with me. You are flat wrong about this case.
this poster who keeps apologizing for some cop who raped a woman.
You're fabricating things. Try to stick to the facts.