Posted on 09/28/2006 2:22:59 PM PDT by neverdem
Time for both sides to shut up and vote for the pubbie nominees, and save the infighting for the next round of primaries.
No matter how bad it gets on this side, I will never root for the side that wishes our enemies win.
Nah, all of his analogies are extremely poor. This one's closer:
If your son were behaving badly, messing up his life and creating deep debts that you and your family are obligated to pay for, and inviting criminals and beggars into your home without permission, giving them the unfettered run of the place, would you continue to reward him with bonuses and increases in his allowance, because "another son would be worse"?
Yup, I hope the fools who populate this forum and spout that "we need to lose" crap read this and have the capacity to understand it.
So we can safely put you down in Hillary's column, right?
If only most Republicans were conservative in the areas of limiting Federal spending, cutting back on Federal authority in areas they should not be in according to the original intent of the Constitution, and insisted that our borders be protected from illegals, this statement would be correct. Most Republican congressmen and senators are like the liberals of the Kennedy-Johnson era. True conservatives in the Taft-Goldwater mold are rare. Their only saving graces are their strong support of national defense and their moderation in comparison to the socialists and perverts who dominate the Democratic Party.
LOL! Yeah. Only HillaryHell can purge the RINOS and purify the Republican Party.
(that was sarcasm, btw)
In that scenario, it seems you would trade in your own son on a "replacement son" who vows in advance to be far worse.
Exactly!...Right On The Head.
If "she" doesn't scare the living hell out of a voter, there's not much I can do to convince them they are wrong, is there?
Neither will I, but some folks here say they are going to "sit out" this election. In my view, that is the same thing as voting for the other side.
That statement is as logically deficient as the author's analogies are.
Precisely.
No matter how many times or ways they say it's not.
Not to those of us who can understand the English language and can COUNT.
Well said. I'm sick and tired of "conservatives" threatening to stay home, and I'm also tired of the holier-than-thou, party bootlickers who think they're better than those who are frustrated at the GOP over some key issues. Eliminate the RINOs in the primary, but conservatives should all come together in the general.
Seems to me the time to "punish" those with whom you disagree is in the primaries. When the primaries came here in Ohio, I voted for some guy named Pierce over DeWine. Mr. Pierce lost. Now, between DeWine and Sherrod Brown, I will be voting for DeWine, holding my nose while I do it. I hate being put in this position because it seems neither candidate wants to secure the borders but I will not vote for a DemocRAT! They want to get U.S. killed with their sycophantic molly-coddling to these terrorist swine!
Yeah, sure, whatever. I was following one of the patterns of the author's analogies, talking about a son. That's all.
Do you claim that the author's analogies are accurate and logical?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.