Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia hands over powerful warship to China
Reuters via The Star (Malaysia) ^ | 09/28/2006

Posted on 09/28/2006 8:46:48 AM PDT by Republicain

ST PETERSBURG, Russia (Reuters) - Russia handed over to China a destroyer equipped with state-of-the-art weaponry on Thursday, finalising a $1.5 billion deal analysts say boosts Beijing's clout in its stand-off with Taiwan.

"The handover act was signed today, and a Chinese flag was hoisted on the ship," a Russian defence industry source told Reuters, requesting anonymity.

The warship was the fourth Project 956E 'Sovremenny' (Modern) class destroyer built at the Northern Shipyard in Russia's second city St Petersburg and sold to China under a 2002 deal through Russia's state arms trader Rosoboronexport.

In the late 1990s China bought two such ships under a separate contract.

"Rosoboronexport is interested in further sales to China, and we are not talking only about ships," the defence industry source said. "The company is actively promoting its output in China. But there have been no new orders for ships."

Defence analysts say the destroyers boost China's military might in the Pacific region and against Taiwan, the island to which Nationalist forces fled when Communists took over the mainland in 1949 at the end of the Chinese civil war.

Beijing considers Taiwan a breakaway province and has vowed to attack it if it declares formal independence.

Washington is bound by law to defend Taiwan and analysts say a conflict in the Taiwan Strait could quickly become a battle between Chinese and U.S. forces.

"Concern about these ships in both Taipei and Washington is justified by the fact that Taiwan and perhaps even the U.S. Navy lacks an effective defence against the ship's SS-N-22 Sunburn (3M-80E Moskit) supersonic anti-ship missile," Washington-based think-tank the International Assessment and Strategy Center said on its Internet site www.strategycenter.net.

"This missile travels at about three times the speed of sound and can perform violent manoeuvres that can defeat most defences designed to ward off subsonic anti-ship missiles."

Apart from anti-aircraft missiles, the destroyer also carries a Ka-28 helicopter armed with rocket-propelled antisubmarine torpedoes.

In 2004-06 Russia built and sold to China six Kilo class diesel-electric submarines.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armsrace; chicoms; china; chinesenavy; coldwar2; f14; jintao; putin; russia; soviets; vykor; warship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 09/28/2006 8:46:49 AM PDT by Republicain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Republicain

Those two countries are up to no good


2 posted on 09/28/2006 8:50:01 AM PDT by Mo1 (Hey McCain and Graham .... our soldiers signed up to dodge bullets not lawsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

What would the US Navy use to defend against such a missile?

The "Sunburn" sounds formidable.


3 posted on 09/28/2006 8:52:45 AM PDT by RexBeach (Will Rogers Never Met Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

There's "state of the art" and then there's USN state of the art.


4 posted on 09/28/2006 8:53:11 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/966345/posts


5 posted on 09/28/2006 8:57:04 AM PDT by Leg Olam ("There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell them." Louis Armstrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

Russia...providing the US Navy with potential targets for over 80 years.


6 posted on 09/28/2006 8:59:50 AM PDT by Busywhiskers (Democrats delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach


Well...let's see...ahh...oh yeah... Naval Air Power.

No Chicomm or Russian ship would have much of a chance in a real engagement to get close enough to US Navy surface ships to ever fire a missile anything against them...


7 posted on 09/28/2006 9:03:09 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lee Heggy123
"With these test firings RAM demonstrated its unparalleled success against today's most challenging threats. Cumulatively to date more than 180 missiles have been fired against anti-ship missiles and other targets, achieving a success rate over 95%"

*chuckle*

China just bought some more very expensive clay pigeons for our ships to shoot down.

8 posted on 09/28/2006 9:04:37 AM PDT by TChris (The United Nations is suffering from delusions of relevance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Republicain
Some details on the Sovremenny class (from Wikipedia). Looks like a fairly hi-tech ship by Russian standards, though I'm guessing it's not in the same league as an USN Arleigh Burke-class.
9 posted on 09/28/2006 9:05:30 AM PDT by DemforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

Exactly. I support them wasting their money on targets that will be eliminated within 10 minutes of hostilities with us. My well-founded speculation is that we track these assets 24 hours a day, have their coordinates at our fingertips, and have missiles available to take them out on short notice. Since we are the only ones successfully testing anti-missile defenses (thank you President Reagan!) ours will be safe while theirs will be vulnerable. Buy more, please!


10 posted on 09/28/2006 9:06:45 AM PDT by Defiant (There is no god but AOL, and Muhammad uses Messenger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces

Ditto. PLA surface fleet does not scare me if it does not have aircover from aircraft carriers and ability to logistically project power with a fleet of supply ships. In the 21st Century, what can be seen will be destroyed by precision weaponary. What does scare me is a large submarine fleet designed to attack US shipping in a time of war (since we import most of our strategic materials and components). Subs are lot tougher to find and kill before it does alot of damage.


11 posted on 09/28/2006 9:06:50 AM PDT by Fee (`+Great powers never let minor allies dictate who, where and when they must fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Republicain; Jeff Head

ping


12 posted on 09/28/2006 10:21:43 AM PDT by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
Some details on the Sovremenny class (from Wikipedia). Looks like a fairly hi-tech ship by Russian standards, though I'm guessing it's not in the same league as an USN Arleigh Burke-class.

No doubt, but I do like the look of those dual 130mm turrets, though.

13 posted on 09/28/2006 10:26:01 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Busywhiskers

No kidding. That's a Navy Cross waiting to happen.


14 posted on 09/28/2006 10:46:30 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JOAT

15 posted on 09/28/2006 5:31:23 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach; Busywhiskers; TChris

Sure,the USN can take out the Sunburn.Bigger question is whether the Taiwanese or Vietnamese navies have a similar chance???Not as of now.


16 posted on 09/28/2006 7:59:51 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skeeter; DemforBush

These ships are not the best Russia has to offer,nor is the Sunburn.They have newer weapons like the SSN-26 Yakhont or SSN-27 Klub which are more stealthy & 'smarter' than the Sunburn.The Sovremmenys were designed to be cheap workhorses for the Soviet Navy with their steam turbine engines & limited ASW capability.They have far newer destroyers or frigates.

From what ive read about this new Chinese ships,they have had some improvements,including removal of one of the 130 mm gun turrets to install the 'Kashtan' missile-gun CIWS.


17 posted on 09/28/2006 8:04:32 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

These are useless for everything barring first-strike.The Russians built them to unload their Sunburns on a US/NATO battle group & get sunk after it.Don't expect the Chinese to use it differently.


18 posted on 09/28/2006 8:07:11 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Republicain

The Kursk?


19 posted on 09/28/2006 8:08:03 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush; Jeff Head; skeeter
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us A new Sov,delivered in 2005 to China-it's deck appears far less cluttered than earlier variants.
20 posted on 09/29/2006 5:04:53 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson